Archive for March, 2010

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Shamed  children come from  families that are closed; families that are not emotionally lubricated, but remain stuck in an unloving and shaming atmosphere. Very often as the pain of toxic shame becomes intolerable, the family may turn on an individual member to vent their shame and relieve their pain.

When the child’s emotional needs are not met, and when the child becomes an adult, the child within the adult carries these same unmet needs. This needy child within the adult can never be emotionally satisfied, and can never satisfy his own children. As the child grows and leaves the home all the other systems (social, church, work etc.) only add to the shame that is at that unfortunate person’s core. In other words, we are formed by our childhood, our brain is programmed by the type of attachment to our primary caregiver. If that caregiver does not give us emotional warmth we feel unloved, and eventually unloveable.

what affects our grieving?

Monday, March 29th, 2010

There are many factors that ensure that we all grieve differently. Counsellors call these mediators of mourning. One of the most important is that of relationship and kinship. Clearly a different response may be forthcoming at the death of an aged parent as against that of a child.  The death of a distant cousin will evoke a different response to that of a sibling. And so on.

The nature of the attachment between the survivor and the deceased is one of the most crucial elements affecting the grief response. Attachment has been much written about by psychologists. It is a complex issue, but at its simplest, the stronger the attachment the greater the grieving pain.  A counsellor called Mary Jones once wrote that ‘grief is the price we pay for love’. How often did I say this when I was grieving my child, when I prayed for relief from the torment. Of course, I found there was no escape. I loved my child dearly, and hence my pain was great. In a sense it was a contradiction for me to pray for release. It was like praying for release from the love I had for my child.

unhealthy shame

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

It is important to recall that in the early stages of our lives, we learn from our parents. We are like sponges. Dr Margaret Paul explains that the feeling of shame comes from the feeling that there is something  wrong with us, that we are basically flawed, inadequate, wrong, bad, unimportant, undeserving, or not good enough. As a result of not feeling seen, loved, valued, and understood, we came to believe that we were not loved because there was something wrong with us. Lynne Namka says that shame gives us a ‘fundamental sense of inadequacy’.

 We learn our feelings, our behaviours, our boundaries (physical, emotional, intellectual), how to relate, our moral foundations, coping skills, and so on. But, shamed parents cannot do these, and thus cannot model them for their children. They are unable to give their children the emotional time that is required for the child’s needs, and for the child’s emotional development. They simply don’t know how. They are too focussed and preoccupied with their own mysterious pain. The child, therefore, is abandoned, and never learns the emotional comfort, and, indeed, the right to feel happy; and, in the future, cannot pass it on to their own children. It’s so sad.

IT TAKES TIME TO HEAL

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

I once read a book by Judy Tatelbaum called The Courage to Grieve, which I found very helpful. It taught me what saying goodbye really meant. For a long time I was afraid to say goodbye to my child. Somehow I equated this to forgetting him.  As Tatelbaum says, saying goodbye simply means emotionally accepting my child’s death, and moving on. It means finding a place for the dead in our emotional life. This takes time. Indeed the maxim that people often use, that time heals, is true. But we must allow it to heal, and in a later post I will look at what happens when we do not allow it to heal. Of course I now accept that it is impossible to accept the death of a child. We integrate it as best we can.

 What I would like to look at in the next few posts is do we all grieve the same way. This is a very important question. By assuming that we all grieve in the same way, we can sometimes cause offence and pain to the bereaved by offering well meant but ill-considered remarks. I used be extremely angry when people said to me ‘you have an angel in Heaven’. I didn’t want an angel in Heaven.  I wanted my child on earth. People were projecting their own feelings onto me.

TOXIC SHAME

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

toxic shame over  generations can be fuelled by family secrets. These may include suicides, addictions, incest, abortions, and other disasters. The closed family tries to keep them secret, and they create havoc in the family through the impact of the shame generated. Families automatically and subconsciously create defences to cope with this. Such defences may include the freezing or repression of feelings, denial, and even idealization of parents. The real difficulty arises because they are subconscious or unconscious, and so cannot be dealt with without the help of counselling and therapy.

For some reason ‘like often attracts like’, and it frequently happens that shame based people are attracted to each other, and form relationships. Thus toxic shame is at the core of their relationship, they tend to shame each other and are unable to show real intimacy. Their children are exposed (from the moment they open their eyes) to this shame-based environment. This will become clearer in a later post when I deal with the characteristics and behaviours of shame based people.

grieving a loss

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

The fourth task is to emotionally relocate the deceased, and move on with life.  This can be most difficult. It is the same as acceptance in the so-called wheel of grief. If the survivor is unable to complete this task, it means being emotionally stuck, and holding on to a past attachment to the extent of being unable to form other attachments.

Doing this task means being able to preserve a realistic memory of the dead in a way that enables the survivor to live in a healthy and fulfilling manner.  There was a time when survivors were advised to sever the bond and move on.  But this interpretation has rightly been questioned in recent years. It is now accepted that that the healthy resolution of grief involves a continuing bond with the deceased. When the theory of severing the bond was held by psychologists, the counselling offered was nothing short of brutal and abusive.

 Some bereavement psychologists explore different ways of keeping in touch with the dead, and at the same time moving on. These include sensing the presence of the dead, having a spiritual relation with them, talking to them, and using symbolic places and things associated with them. Although I did not know him, I pray to my paternal grandfather every day, and sense that he is somehow looking after me. It is a very comforting thought. I also feel strongly emotionally attached to my child. Serenity has returned to my life, but there are times such as anniversaries, and at Christmas, when I experience deep grief pain. And so it will continue to be. And that is o.k. It is part of normal grief.

toxic or unhealthy shame

Monday, March 15th, 2010

I have looked at enmeshment as one powerful source of toxic shame. There are many others, and these are well illustrated by John Bradshaw. I have already briefly explored enmeshment by the primary carer, (normally the mother) as a source of toxic shame, and as the source that is most difficult to become aware of.  How difficult it is to criticize and blame one’s mother. The mother is a key figure in what the psychologists call the family system, and the nature of the family system is often at the root of toxic shame.

 Bradshaw makes the valid point that toxic shame is mainly bred in significant relationships, and our significant relationships are obviously in our families. If a family is dysfunctional, it will pass this dysfunction on to the next generation, and so on.  Like abusive behaviour, toxic shame can carry on from generation to generation, unless it is dealt with at some stage. I’m sure you have often heard the old saying ‘like father, like son’! I believe that this does not mean that we have inherited our behaviours in a genetic way, but that we have learned them from a previous generation. As one generation sprays toxic shame onto the next, it continues into the future to destroy happiness, until and unless it is stopped in its tracks.

grieving

Monday, March 15th, 2010

 Apart from accepting the reality of the loss, and working through the pain of  grief  we have   to adjust to an environment in which the deceased is missing, and to emotionally relocate the deceased and move on with life. Using the word ‘task’, as I have written in the last article, seems a bit harsh, but it does empower the bereaved person. It shows that he or she can do something to promote healing.

 Adjusting to life without the deceased means different things to different people. For example, the quality of adjustment made by widows depends upon many factors, such as the quality of her relationship with the deceased husband, the quality of their sexual relationship, if there are children to be raised, and her previous role in the management of domestic finances. Bereaved parents have to cope with their own pain, but also possibly with that of their other children. I was very worried about how my children were coping, and I found their pain hard to bear.  I felt powerless to help them.

 Other adjustments involve a new definition of oneself, even the development of self-esteem. The central question is ‘who am I now?’. There is also the question of spiritual adjustment, of finding meaning in the loss, regaining control, and seeing the world as a benevolent place. All easier said than done.

toxic or unhealthy shame

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Fundamentally being enmeshed means losing one’s identity. The child’s identity becomes entangled with that of the parent. The child cannot learn proper boundaries, and suffers a loss of self-esteem. Self-esteem comes from a strong sense of identity and separateness. The child who has been enmeshed may suffer from toxic shame and may have a rage (people may refer to it as a temper) until the roots of the shame have been explored. Such rage will also spring from the subconscious feeling that an abuse has occurred. Nothing kindles rage as much as abuse.

 Lynn Namka examines other sources of shame caused by adults to children. She looks at parental withdrawal, favouring a sibling, having very high standards of behavior, and reacting with anger when the child fails to reach them. Shame is also sown in the child by punishing them for crying or for showing other forms of vulnerability, such as being in pain or distress. Sexual abuse is one of the greatest causes of shame, making the child feel dirty and bad, and the child can absorb the shame of the abuser.

These are easier to trace as sources of shame. They are self-evident. Enmeshment, however, is more difficult because it is more subtle. The child as an adult may remember being very much loved by the primary carer, and cannot understand why over-love breeds rage and shame.

TASKS OF GRIEVING

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

 

In my last posting I mentioned the 4 tasks of mourning.  The immediate task is to accept the reality of the loss. If we fail in accepting that it happened we will become stuck in the grieving process, and will inevitably suffer anger and perhaps depression.  Accepting the reality of the death of a loved one, however, is not easy. We can convince ourselves that we have done so, but we must feel this acceptance. Acceptance is not a happy feeling, but is one of peace, where the anxiety and confusion, have dissolved. Very often there is denial, and this is seen by some psychologists as a temporary healthy reaction, and a buffer to cope with sudden death.

 My own acceptance of my son’s death was immediate.  I suffered the full, crushing impact of the loss at once. However, I now realise that this was a biological and intellectual acceptance, rather than an emotional one. Emotional acceptance enables the survivor to properly grieve and move on. I have to admit that I will never fully accept the death of my child. talk again on Monday.